OneWeb confirms Starlink 5G disruption warning

0
2
OneWeb confirms Starlink 5G disruption warning

If approved, “large parts of the United States would be rendered inaccessible by the normally ubiquitous NGSO [fixed satellite service] user terminals,” stated Kimberly Baum, OneWeb’s vice president of spectrum engineering and strategy.

The analysis from OneWeb is the latest in a string of studies assessing how a high-power mobile network in the 12.2-12.7 GHz band would impact NGSO services.

However, SpaceX told the FCC June 21 that its analysis shows Starlink users would suffer harmful interference 77% of the time.

According to studies conducted by engineering firm RKF Engineering Solutions for RS Access, the 5G network would impact fewer than 1% of NGSO terminals, and mitigation techniques are readily available for those that are affected.

Story Highlights

  • OneWeb encouraged the Federal Communications Commission in a letter to deny a request for two-way mobile services in the band from satellite broadcaster Dish Network and spectrum holder RS Access.

  • To connect user terminals, the SpaceX-owned Starlink and OneWeb megaconstellations use a satellite downlink band that extends from 10.7 GHz to 12.7 GHz.

SpaceX said the RFK analysis was full of inaccuracies, and also failed to address how NGSO operators share the band among themselves through coordination agreements.

The 5G for 12 GHz Coalition, which includes Dish and RS Access, hit back July 7 by slamming SpaceX’s study as “scientifically and logically flawed.”

The coalition took particular issue with how SpaceX’s analysis extrapolated nationwide assumptions from tests conducted in Las Vegas. Baum said OneWeb’s analysis largely used the same assumptions as the RFK study, with “corrections only to the most egregiously flawed assumptions adopted by RS Access when applied to the OneWeb system, some of which overlap with corrections made by SpaceX in its study.”

OneWeb spokesperson Katie Dowd said the study drew from a suburban area where both systems could be deployed, which she declined to disclose. “Additionally, we made a number of changes to take into account the OneWeb system and our business model, such as looking at NGSO user terminals deployed on the tops of several story commercial buildings that one might find in a suburban business park,” Dowd said.

Like SpaceX, OneWeb’s main issue with the RFK analysis is its assumption that NGSO FSS terminals will be deployed with a heavy bias toward rural areas, while mobile base stations and devices will be heavily skewed towards urban areas. “There is no real world justification for this bias,” Baum wrote to the FCC.

The RS Access studies also only used Starlink to model interference, ignoring other NGSO operators she said “are architecturally, systematically, and entrepreneurially distinct from Starlink.” According to Baum, including OneWeb and others would substantially increase the number of customers that an expanded terrestrial service would adversely harm.

This is “completely masked in the RS Access studies, since it looks at deployment spread over the entire United States as opposed to local conditions,” Baum said. OneWeb’s study warns the operation of NGSO FSS user terminals in an area of expected mobile deployment “will almost always” result in harmful interference.